December 23 afternoon, the 31th meeting of 10 classes of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress divides into groups to review the amendment draft of tax law , participant revolves around to solicit some modification , spread out heat to discuss. Take the charge of g courtesy committee member suggestion, " suggestion rise to solicit some raising is / month of 3000 Yuan is advisable. " take the charge of g courtesy to show , as soon as calculating roughly, next year, the consumer expense of average per capita is / month of 1800 Yuan , will exceed / month of 2000 Yuan the year after next , is modified actually this time by all means for a year. " as this frequently modification, look not enough serious. "( the world of December 25 online reprint " Chinese economy newspaper " reportHttp: / /news.sina.com.cn/c/2007-12-25/012214592087.shtml)
At the moment, deduct volume about tax after all should decide when amount, 2000, 2500 and 3000 are still 3500s? Should you raise tax to deduct volume , or should reduce tax tax rate? , , , various opinions, fail to eventuate in a common understanding. Arise this kind of unprecedented argument of whole people , on the one hand is because of tax levy this the very problem is very complex, one is because argue different aspects interests difference, see that problem starting point is different, at the same time, this problem barrier goes through everybody immediate interests, the instinct of the masses land attention.
The author thinks , this kind of argument has covered a problem: Tax after all should should not levy. From now, open report sees that levying tax major purpose is to regulate poor rich gap, increase tax revenue to fall when secondly. May problem is , levy tax can regulate poor rich gap really? " December 25 t looks over " Newsweek reports first to give have made answer: Guangdong province local taxation bureau has offered a group of data: First half of the year of 2007 years, the Guangdong province 20.7858 billion Yuan of individual income tax of gross income, privately-owned business produces to manage the project gotten , take 13.81% only, wages salary gets project to take 68.12%. The Guangdong province local research meeting of tax revenue president Lu Lan Gui after above-mentioned data analysis think , a tax has arisen the phenomenon " contrary is regulated ": High income person undertakes seldom, and salaried class has become tax negative main part.
Facing the conclusion as this violation original intention, do not know that others how to think that anyway, I feel very funny. Certainly, perhaps, somebody says that need to only so raise tax because of arising this kind of condition to deduct volume , the tax of the low-income group in alleviation undertakes at the same time, increase for high income person levy intensity. So, having raised tax deduct volume, can solve this problem? Not definitely. First, so long as it is economic continued prosperous of our country, price continuity rises , so, the income of the masses will surely increase. So, the tax of 3500 Yuan after one year deducts volume, the role of playing the part of will have no what difference with current 1600 Yuan.
Secondly, as commentator Shu Sheng Xiang points out , so actually raising tax to deduct volume have " benefit paradox": From each, solicit adjustment, actually taking in the more high person gain advantage the more, instead of we usual think " in alleviate considerably large low work salary income person tax undertakes ". Hit analogy , take in the person of 1800 Yuan in one month, it is to deliver 10 Yuan every month less that rising to solicit some adjustment bring his benefit; And take in the person of 2000 Yuan in one month, the benefit that can get is 20 Yuan; Take in the person of 2500 Yuan in one month, the benefit that can get is 40 Yuan; Being deduced by analogy and taking in person high the highest benefit that can get is to deliver 180 Yuan every month less.
Levy finally, if come to expound and prove tax from the meaning of more deep layer, we will discover tax levies can neither realize is fair, and it has to harm efficiency and fairness. Western more and more economists and sociology scholars discover that overweight tax has obstructed the development of socioeconomy, its reason is the desire of personal creation wealth has weakened - - as the personal hard money gained can be snatched by government with legal name, that has better to gain money less. , a tax waits for until the transfer guarantee of tax revenue encourages all, is not positive to work: Anyway, government lives from the tax guarantee of rich person that solicited , and still lives good, why do you still work hard to work?
Therefore, near some year comes to the West man of insight always appeal to cancel individual income tax - - reason is western country after this tens of conducted policy years of tax revenue, encouragement mechanism has gotten infringement, economy has appeared to go down seriously. So, the hair after always advocates advantage we, why do you still repeat the mistake of one others?
没有评论:
发表评论